|
|
POLICY & ADVOCACY: ISSUES: NATIIONAL FOREST ROADLESS AREAS
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL FOREST ROADLESS AREAS
|
|
|
|
The Roadless Area Conservation Rule, as promulgated in January 2001, would
prevent logging, road construction, mining, and drilling on 58.5 million acres
of unspoiled national forest system lands, except in rare circumstances. In May
2005, the Bush Administration announced its new plans for roadless area
management, repealing the popular Roadless Area Conservation Rule and replacing
it with a state-by-state petition process. The new plan gave governors the
option to petition the federal government for protections for roadless areas in
their states, providing no guarantee of protection and potentially opening
portions of many favorite hiking destinations to activities that degrade
resources and habitat and diminish scenic views and opportunities for solitude.
|
|
|
|
CURRENT STATUS
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, a California federal judge reinstated the 2001
Roadless Rule, overturning a Bush Administration rule that required governors
to petition the federal government to protect national forests in their states
and would have allowed states to build logging roads through millions of acres
of publicly owned national forests.
|
|
|
|
The judge found that the Bush Administration
violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act
when it repealed the 2001 Roadless Rule. However, ongoing legal battles
continue to threaten the fate of the 2001 Roadless Rule and the lands it
protects, which are critical to wildlife, backcountry recreation, and
downstream water quality. In April 2007, the Bush administration, along with
the timber industry, filed an appeal challenging this latest ruling.
|
|
|
|
In May 2007, the House and Senate introduced legislation to protect our
national forest roadless areas for future generations.
Learn more and take action.
|
|
|
|
UPDATE: |
|
|
|
Right now there is a proposed national rulemaking to decide the fate
of 9.3 million acres of backcountry areas in Idaho's national
forests—representing the core of the last intact forest ecosystem in the lower
48 states.
|
|
|
|
CLICK HERE to Ask the Forest
Service to Protect Our Nation's Backcountry Forests
|
|
|
|
JUST RELEASED!
View a video produced by the Outdoor Alliance about roadless areas and
why they deserve protection.
|
|
|
|
WHY DO WE NEED THE ROADLESS RULE?
|
|
|
|
More than half of the lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service have already been
impacted by decades of forest clearcutting, oil and gas development, mining,
and other industrial uses. The many ecological benefits of roadless areas -
such as large, undisturbed landscapes, improving air and water quality, and
preserving habitat for plant and animal species - are all important to hikers
and contribute to the hiking experience. Roadless areas provide myriad
opportunities for solitude, renewal, and inspiration in the wild backcountry of
national forests, and they include thousands of hiking trails across the
country, including renowned footpaths such as the Appalachian, North Country,
and Pacific Crest National Scenic Trails. Roadless areas are critical for
recreation.
|
|
|
|
National Forests alone have nearly 400,000 miles of roads - 10 times
the size of the U.S. interstate system. The Forest Service faces a nearly $10
billion backlog of deferred maintenance and reconstruction of existing roads
and enormous deficits from the federal timber program.
|
|
|
|
The Roadless Rule was the result of the most
extensive public participation in a rulemaking process in history. Despite more
than 600 public hearings and more than 4 million total comments overwhelmingly
in favor of strong roadless protection, including letters from American Hiking
and our members, the Bush Administration re-examined and ultimately repealed
the policy. The rule has faced numerous legal challenges since it was
promulgated, with some judges ruling in favor of it, and others ruling against
it.
|
|
|
|
American Hiking strongly believes that roadless
area protection warrants national policy guidance. Leaving decisions on road
construction, logging, motorized recreation, and other development in roadless
areas solely to the local planning process on a forest-by-forest basis or under
a state-by state-basis, provides no guarantee of protection.
|
|
|
|
For more information : |
|
|
|
Forest
Service's Roadless Area Conservation Web site |
|
|
|
Heritage
Forests Campaign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|